70-348 Exam Guide: What the Legacy Microsoft PPM Exam Covered and What to Do Instead
Exam 70-348, “Managing Projects and Portfolios with Microsoft PPM,” was designed around project and portfolio management capabilities in Microsoft Project and Project Web App. It is no longer a practical scheduling target: a Microsoft-hosted support response states that the exam was retired, and Microsoft’s retirement policy says retired exams cannot be taken or used to earn the associated credential. This guide helps former candidates decide whether to preserve historical knowledge, investigate a successor credential, or redirect preparation toward current Microsoft credentials and hands-on Project Web App concepts.
Is 70-348 still available?
No. Treat 70-348 as a retired legacy exam rather than an exam you can book through the normal Microsoft certification process. A Microsoft-hosted scheduling discussion about 70-348 states that the exam was retired and could not be taken through the process under discussion. Microsoft’s current retirement guidance says that retired exams cannot be taken and that their associated certifications or credentials cannot be earned after retirement.
The practical consequence is important for anyone searching for 70-348 dumps, a practice test, or a booking link: do not use the existence of an old exam page or a third-party listing as evidence that an appointment is available. The historical exam number identifies an earlier Microsoft assessment, not a current registration route.
Microsoft also explains that exams are retired when they no longer reflect relevant skills or technologies. That makes a current credential or skills assessment a better choice when the objective is to demonstrate present-day capability. If the objective is historical research, the old exam title and Project Web App documentation can still help define the subject area, but they should not be presented as a current certification pathway.
How to verify a replacement before studying
Start with Microsoft Learn’s current credentials catalog rather than a search result for the old exam number. Compare the current credential’s role, technology coverage, and assessment requirements with the work you actually perform. Microsoft’s 2019 mapping article explains the broader transition from legacy 70-xxx exams to newer role-based certifications, but it does not establish a direct replacement for 70-348 in the supplied evidence.
If no direct successor is shown, ask what outcome you need. A current Microsoft Certification may suit a role-based validation goal. A current Applied Skills credential may suit a narrower, task-based demonstration. If your employer specifically names Microsoft Project or Project Web App, verify the product and credential status directly before paying for training or committing to a study schedule.
What did the exam validate?
The exam title identifies a management-oriented focus: managing projects and portfolios with Microsoft PPM. The supplied Microsoft documentation supports the portfolio side of that scope by describing Project Web App portfolio analysis, business drivers, project prioritization, budget, resources, and comparisons between analyses. It does not provide a verified historical skills-measurement blueprint for 70-348, so no official domain percentages or task list should be invented.
A reasonable historical interpretation is that a candidate needed to understand how project ideas and projects could be evaluated against organizational goals and constraints, rather than merely knowing isolated interface commands. The central question was the quality of a portfolio decision: which work offers the best business value with the available budget and people.
That interpretation should guide study, but label it correctly. It is a preparation framework built from the exam name and Microsoft’s Project Web App documentation, not a recovered official exam outline. Treat any website claiming exact 70-348 domains, percentages, question counts, passing scores, or current delivery details with caution unless Microsoft directly supports the claim.
Portfolio analysis as the central concept
Microsoft describes portfolio analysis as an interactive way to choose projects that offer the best business value within available budget and resources. A portfolio can contain projects or project ideas, such as a group of IT initiatives or proposed products. The management task is to turn competing proposals into a defensible selection decision.
The documented process begins with business drivers. These are measurable organizational goals, such as improving customer satisfaction, expanding market share, or reducing IT costs. A manager defines and prioritizes those drivers, then records how strongly each project affects each driver. The analysis uses that information to help prioritize projects.
Project Web App can create multiple analyses for the same set of projects and compare them. That matters because a portfolio decision changes when priorities, budget, or resource availability change. Study this as a decision model: define the objective, connect projects to the objective, apply constraints, examine the result, and compare alternatives.
What the available evidence does not prove
The supplied sources do not verify a 70-348 exam blueprint, measured-skill percentages, prerequisites, question format, exam duration, language list, price, passing score, or delivery method. This guide therefore does not assign weights to domains or convert product documentation into unsupported exam specifications.
The Project Web App article applies to several Project Server versions, including Project Server Subscription Edition, Project Server 2019, Project Server 2016, and Project Server 2013. That product documentation is useful for understanding the management concepts, but it does not prove that every documented feature appeared on the historical exam. Use it as a technical learning reference, not as a substitute for an official retired-exam outline.
Who would have benefited from 70-348?
The historical subject matter would have been most relevant to people responsible for selecting, comparing, prioritizing, or governing projects in a Microsoft PPM environment. That includes portfolio decision-makers, project and program management practitioners, and administrators or consultants who needed to connect project information with organizational priorities. The available evidence supports the work context, but it does not establish formal prerequisites or an official candidate profile.
This was not simply a scheduling or task-tracking topic. The portfolio analysis documentation emphasizes return on investment from budget and resources, business drivers, and comparisons among candidate project groups. Someone who only creates individual project plans would need to broaden preparation toward strategic selection and constrained investment decisions.
For a current learner, the relevant audience is narrower still: people who need to understand legacy Microsoft PPM concepts or maintain an older Project Server environment. If your goal is a current Microsoft credential, choose the current role or scenario first and use legacy 70-348 material only where it directly supports that work.
Choose your learning objective before choosing materials
Use one of three objectives. For legacy-system support, study the documented Project Web App workflow and the business reasoning behind portfolio analysis. For migration or modernization, map old concepts such as business drivers, project ideas, prioritization, budget, and resources to the current platform and governance model in your organization. For credentialing, abandon the old exam number as the booking target and select a current Microsoft credential from the official catalog.
This decision prevents a common waste of time: collecting old questions or videos without knowing whether the target is historical knowledge, operational competence, or a current credential. A retired exam can be useful background, but it cannot by itself satisfy a current certification objective.
How should you study the documented concepts?
Study in the order a portfolio decision is made, not in alphabetical order and not by memorizing feature names. Begin with business objectives, move to project impact and prioritization, then apply budget and resource constraints, and finish by comparing alternative analyses. This sequence gives each feature a reason to exist and makes it easier to explain a decision in practical terms.
First, define the business drivers. Write measurable goals rather than vague preferences. “Reduce IT costs” is a documented example of a driver; in your notes, add the evidence you would use to recognize whether that goal matters to the organization. Next, rank the drivers and note that different prioritizations can support different decision contexts.
Then examine project impact. A retail-store project may strongly support expanding market share while doing little for reducing IT costs. An email-system upgrade may have the opposite pattern. Build a small matrix of proposed initiatives and drivers, but keep the values as your own study exercise rather than pretending they are official Microsoft scoring values.
Finally, model constraints. Ask which projects produce the strongest business value when the organization cannot fund or staff everything. Create more than one analysis with the same project set, change the priorities or available constraints in your exercise, and compare the outcomes. The goal is to explain why the selected set changes, not to memorize a preferred answer.
A practical note-taking method
For every concept, record four items: its purpose, the information it needs, the management decision it influences, and the mistake it helps prevent. For business drivers, the purpose is to express measurable goals; the needed information is the organization’s priorities; the decision is how projects are ranked; and the mistake is selecting work by enthusiasm alone.
For portfolio analyses, record the project set, driver prioritization, budget or resource assumptions, and the resulting recommendation. Then write a short justification in plain language. This creates study material that tests reasoning and exposes gaps better than copying definitions.
Keep a separate page titled “verified” and another titled “inference.” Put Microsoft-documented behavior in the first page. Put your assumed workflows, lab exercises, and likely historical emphasis in the second. This simple separation prevents a practical recommendation from becoming an unsupported claim about the exam.
A small scenario to practise
Suppose an organization has a limited pool of people and funding for several proposed initiatives. One initiative primarily supports customer satisfaction, another supports market expansion, and a third is intended to reduce IT costs. Define those goals as business drivers, prioritize them for a particular planning cycle, and record how each initiative affects each driver.
Run the reasoning again with a different priority order or a different constraint. Do not focus on producing a universal winner. Explain which project set best fits the stated drivers and available capacity in each version. That explanation is the transferable skill: portfolio selection depends on goals and constraints, not on a project’s popularity in isolation.
What mistakes should candidates avoid?
The largest mistake is preparing as if 70-348 were an active exam. A current-looking practice site, an old Microsoft link, or a scheduler redirect does not override Microsoft’s retirement policy. Confirm availability and the current credential objective before buying material, booking travel, or setting a test date.
A second mistake is treating portfolio analysis as a feature- memorization exercise. The documented workflow is decision-centered: business drivers are defined and prioritized, project effects are considered, and project groups are evaluated against budget and resources. If your notes list screens but cannot explain the business decision behind them, preparation is incomplete.
A third mistake is assuming that an old exam title supplies an exact blueprint. The supplied sources do not verify percentages or measured domains for 70-348. Do not publish or rely on bare weights, question counts, durations, prices, languages, or passing scores as though they were confirmed facts.
A fourth mistake is ignoring version context. The portfolio analysis documentation applies to multiple Project Server versions. A feature or procedure learned from one environment may not transfer unchanged to another. Identify the Project Server or Project Web App version used in your work, and verify operational details in the documentation for that version.
A final mistake is using dumps or leaked-question claims as a substitute for competence. Such material cannot establish that an exam is active, cannot reliably represent current product behavior, and cannot guarantee a passing result. Use legitimate documentation and hands-on exercises instead.
A better way to review weak areas
When an exercise exposes a gap, classify it as one of three problems: terminology, workflow, or decision reasoning. Terminology gaps require a short definition in your own words. Workflow gaps require a documented sequence from setup to result. Decision gaps require a comparison of alternatives under stated priorities and constraints.
Review the category rather than rereading everything. This keeps preparation proportional to the actual weakness and is especially useful when the original exam blueprint is unavailable. If the gap concerns a current credential, check that credential’s official skills outline instead of assuming the retired exam’s scope remains valid.
What delivery and registration information can be confirmed?
No current delivery option for 70-348 should be assumed. Microsoft’s general registration guidance describes a process that begins from a current certification or exam-details page and then uses the provider’s scheduling button, but the supplied evidence says 70-348 was retired. The general process therefore cannot be used to make the old exam bookable.
For active Microsoft exams, the current guidance says that candidates may see Pearson VUE or, in specific contexts, Certiport. It also says that most exams may be available online or at a local test center when those options are offered by the provider. Those are current general rules, not evidence that 70-348 has either option.
The same guidance says online candidates should run a system pre-check and meet security requirements, while a test center provides a pre-configured testing environment. It also advises requesting disability accommodations before scheduling. Apply these instructions only after confirming that the selected current exam is active and that the provider offers the chosen delivery mode.
If you are pursuing a current Microsoft exam
Sign in to the Learn Profile you intend to use and ensure its legal name matches your legal identification before scheduling. Microsoft’s registration guidance says the scheduling flow may prompt you to create or sign in to a Learn Profile and recommends using a personal Microsoft account. If you need an accommodation, request it before booking so the provider can review the testing arrangement.
For an active exam scheduled through Pearson VUE, Microsoft’s guidance states that exams can be scheduled no more than 90 days in advance and that a maximum of two Microsoft Certification exams may be scheduled at one time through Pearson VUE. Check the live registration page because provider rules and availability are operational details that can change.
If the scheduling button fails, use the official exam-provider or Credentials Support routes rather than repeatedly trying an obsolete 70-348 link. The supplied Microsoft Q&A thread directs scheduling questions to the dedicated certification support forum and provider support, while the credentials-support page distinguishes appointment issues from technical delivery problems.
A focused roadmap for legacy knowledge or a new target
Use a four-stage roadmap. Stage one is target confirmation: decide whether you need historical 70-348 knowledge, legacy Project Server support, or a current Microsoft credential. Stage two is concept learning: study business drivers, project impact, prioritization, budget, resources, and portfolio comparison. Stage three is applied practice: build small analyses and justify different outcomes. Stage four is validation: verify the current credential or product documentation and remove unsupported assumptions from your notes.
The roadmap is deliberately not expressed as a fixed number of days or hours. The supplied evidence does not establish a valid 70-348 schedule, and your starting experience, environment, and chosen current credential will determine the appropriate pace.
Stage one: confirm the destination
Check Microsoft Learn’s credentials catalog and retirement guidance. If the intended outcome is a current credential, record its exact name, role, technology, and official assessment route. If the outcome is legacy support, record the Project Server or Project Web App version in scope and the business processes you need to perform.
Do not schedule study around a claimed 70-348 retirement date unless Microsoft’s current source supplies one for that exam. The supplied material confirms retirement status through the support discussion and policy, but it does not provide a verified retirement date for 70-348.
Stage two: build the concept map
Create linked notes for business drivers, driver prioritization, project impact, project ideas, budget, available resources, portfolio analysis, and comparison of analyses. For each term, write what it changes in a management decision. This turns the Project Web App article into a working model rather than a glossary.
Use concrete organizational goals. A driver should be measurable, and a project should have a stated influence on each relevant driver. Keep assumptions visible, particularly when you are using a fictional scenario for practice.
Stage three: practise decisions, not recall
Construct a small collection of project proposals and evaluate them under more than one priority arrangement. Explain why the selected portfolio fits the available budget and people. Then change one assumption and explain the new result. This practice develops the reasoning documented by Microsoft without relying on unauthorized exam content.
If you support a real environment, compare the exercise with approved organizational governance rules and the relevant product documentation. Avoid changing production data merely to practise; use a safe test environment or paper-based analysis when appropriate.
Stage four: validate the next action
At the end of preparation, you should be able to state whether your next action is to stop pursuing the retired exam, study a current credential, or deepen legacy product knowledge. For a current exam, use the official certification page and provider scheduling route. For legacy work, retain the concept notes and validate procedures against the version documentation used by your organization.
If a credential or exam appears to be retiring, Microsoft recommends taking it before the retirement date and explains that it cannot be taken or earned after retirement. Do not infer a deadline for 70-348 from that general policy; verify any live target directly.
Where should you go next?
Begin with Microsoft Learn’s credentials catalog if you want a current credential, and use the retirement-policy page to understand why the old exam is not a booking target. Use the Project Web App portfolio-analysis article for the documented management concepts. If the problem is a scheduling or delivery issue for a current exam, follow Microsoft’s registration guidance and the support routes it identifies.
For an editor or candidate maintaining a 70-348 page, the responsible next step is to label the exam as retired, remove calls to book it, and replace unsupported exam specifications with a clear explanation of what is and is not evidenced. A useful page can still help readers understand the legacy subject area and choose a current path without presenting obsolete material as an available certification.
A final candidate checklist
Confirm that your target is active before purchasing preparation material. Identify whether you need a current certification, an Applied Skills credential, or legacy Project Web App knowledge. Study business drivers and their prioritization, project impacts, budget, resources, and comparative portfolio analyses. Practise explaining why a project set fits a stated objective. Keep official facts separate from study inferences. Finally, use Microsoft’s current registration and support pages for any live exam decision.
This checklist is more useful than memorizing a retired exam label. It protects your time, keeps portfolio analysis grounded in the documented business purpose, and directs credential decisions toward information Microsoft currently supports.
Conclusion
70-348 should be treated as historical Microsoft PPM material, not as an available exam to schedule. Its documented subject area remains useful for understanding how Project Web App can connect business drivers, project impacts, budget, resources, and portfolio choices. If you need a credential, verify a current Microsoft option first; if you need legacy expertise, use the portfolio-analysis concepts as a structured learning base and validate version-specific procedures in official documentation. Do not rely on dumps or unsupported exam specifications to make the decision.
